Lot of talk these days about the relative merit of experience versus the symbolism of change. I think I've come down on the side of change.
Experience is simply the name we give to our mistakes. - Oscar Wilde
One of my mistakes - back in 2000, as Bush took office, I was clearly unimpressed with his lack of eloquent leadership, but took solace in the "experience" of his advisers - Cheney, Rumquist, and Powell. Little did I know that they were to prove to be an anti-constitutionalist, a self-impressed managerial prima donna, and a wishy-washy follower. So much for the value of experience.
Another problem with experience is that when it is gained in times of strident, non-productive partisanship, the result is experience in strident, non-productive partisanship, and along the way, enough enemies are made to prett much guarantee that most of what you try to accomplish will either result in more division or succumb to insurmountable roadblocks.
As a "child of the 60's" boomer, I've got enough experience not to expect miracles from the promise(s) of newcomers and relative outsiders (that's for sure), but I still have some hope that things can change, and maybe we can get away from at least some of the divisiveness of the past 15 years.
We just need someone who wasn't at the center of it.
Labels: Obama, politics