Project Management Operational Problem Solving Implementation & Change Management Strategy & Alignment

Frank Patrick's Focused Performance Business Blog
This Focused Performance Weblog started life as a "business management blog" containing links and commentary related primarily to organizational effectiveness with a "Theory of Constraints" perspective, but is in the process of evolving towards primary content on interactive and mobile marketing. Think of it as about Focusing marketing messages for enhanced Performance. If you are on an archive page, current postings are found here.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Twitter - Not Just Oprah and Ashton -- Some linkage on getting some hits of value and productivity from Twitter...

To Tweet or Not to Tweet? How Twitter Can Further Your Brand:
"So just how does a brand use Twitter to further its aims? A few recent anecdotes can help demonstrate how companies need to think about Twitter and its impact on their brands."
Finding Utility in the Jumble of Tweeted Thoughts -
"Individually, many of those 140-character “tweets” seem inane.

But taken collectively, the stream of messages can turn Twitter into a surprisingly useful tool for solving problems and providing insights into the digital mood. By tapping into the world’s collective brain, researchers of all kinds have found that if they make the effort to dig through the mundane comments, the live conversations offer an early glimpse into public sentiment — and even help them shape it."
Six Ways You Should Be Using Twitter (that Don't Involve Breakfast)
1. Instant, Real-Time Search Results...
2. Monitoring Something You Care About...
3. News Updates...
4. Instant Communication with Friends...
5. Twitter as a Productivity Command Line...
6. Ask Questions, Get Answers...
And from Kottke, there's nothing wrong with a bit of trivial diversion now and then...

In defense of Twitter
"'d like to think that most of your daily conversation is weighty and witty but instead everyone chats about pedestrian nonsense with their pals. In fact, that ephemeral chit-chat is the stuff that holds human social groups together."
Tweet on, my sweet tweeters. - @fpatrick

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

Monday, April 27, 2009

Zen Habits | Simple Productivity - A new (for me) blog I've added to my feed reader. It's from the author of The Power of Less: The Fine Art of Limiting Yourself to the Business and in Life, the tagline of which...
"Do Less. Get More Done."
...sounds real familiar.

Kind of a mantra for me.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

So Many Links - So Little Time -- It's link-a-palooza time...
  • What Would Google Do? - The PowerPoint - excerpts from the book.

  • Epiphany: Virtual Teams And Social Media Tribes Are The Same - Yup. That they are, but only if the tribes have some sort of goal that ties them together.

  • 2009 - The Year of SMS, Again - An underrated, under-appreciated, underused channel for communication with your customers.

  • again mobile - Where I'm at these days, working on SMS text campaigns, "mobilizing" web sites, and iPhone/smartphone apps.

  • Mobile Couponing - The Time Could Be Now... - From Mark Taylor, my previous boss' boss' boss.

  • Top 10 Dumb Project Management Questions - Questions from Hal Macomber.

  • Dumb Project Management Questions - Glen Alleman provides some answers to Hal's questions.

  • Why You Shouldn't Copy Us Or Anyone Else - A nice piece related to one of my favorite pet peeve subjects (no, not multi-tasking) - the lack of value in benchmarking and following others' "best practices".

  • Which Comes First? The Product or the Marketing? - From Seth Godin - "Marketing is not the same thing as advertising." True, very true. (My take on shooting sitting ducks from 2006.)

  • Rocks Into Gold - A parable for our time from long-time blog buddy Clarke Ching.

  • Sopranos, Uncensored - NSFW - A little diversion featuring very bit of foul language from every episode of HBO's classic series, but not including the curses coming from the audience at the end of the final episode, when they thought their cable had gone out at the most inopportune moment possible. Someone somewhere has too much time on their hands. Surprised, though, that it's only 27 minutes long.

  • The Human Feed - How Twitter and Networks Filter Signal from Noise

  • The New Work Ethic: Just Paying Attention - Your knew I couldn't finish a list like this one without an anti-multi-tasking link? Of course you did.
  • There's more in the queue, but that's enough for now.

    Labels: , , , , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Sunday, January 11, 2009

    Project Monogamy, Revisted - Serial Monogamy Project Participation is an important post from Johanna Rothman. Success in projects in an organization is less about how the individual projects are managed than about how the multi-project system of shared resources are managed.
    What I’m finding interesting in my work is that people who have some slack can commit to one project much more easily than people who are 100% “committed” to a project. The people who are 100% committed have no slack to provide other projects some consulting or provide future projects some thinking. The people who are only 80% committed to one project (and not committed to something else, slack is key) are more able to finish their work and accommodate the inevitable interruptions.

    When people multitask, they are not committed to a project. They have no slack. They have no time to innovate. They are always behind."
    Not only do resources need slack, but project promises need to me made in a way that includes "slack", allowing for those times when things don't go as planned and for those times when one project impinges on the progress of another.

    The behaviors and expectations that Johanna describe allow that latter situation to happen less frequently.

    Labels: , , , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Friday, December 26, 2008

    Goof off at work, read a book, ignore e-mail -- Story Highlights:
  • Experts: Goofing off at work can relieve stress, improve morale
  • Lower your standards, says one adviser: Learn to let things be good enough.
  • Blow off low-priority tasks, says an expert, see if anyone notices
  • Check voice mail and e-mail less often -- twice a day -- to reduce distractions
  • [via Esther Derby]

    On a related note, Deviant Behavior in Project Management from the Project Shrink blog includes a story on the risks of acting on the third bullet above...
    True story: on a project where I was one of several PMs, weekly progress reports had to be written and send to all other Project Managers. After a while I got the impression that no one was actually reading these things, because of the kind of questions I was getting (answers were all in the reports).

    As I was not fond of reporting just for the sake of reporting anyway, I started little irritating experiments like issuing identical reports with different dates, adding nonsense risks, just to see if anyone was paying attention. As you might have guessed, no responses what so ever. So, I stopped writing the reports. All hell broke loose...

    ...What I was experiencing is called deviant behavior, not performing the behavior that is considered normal within society or a particular social group.
    Not really the same thing, but this reminds me of a weekly status report I saw years ago that essentially said "there will be no status report this week."

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Saturday, December 06, 2008

    What does intranet innovation mean? --
    "It’s all about solving business problems. Real value comes from innovative ways of meeting business or staff needs in new ways. These improvements often target one area of the organisation, or a single key group of staff."
    It ain't just a collection of templates.

    Labels: ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Thursday, November 06, 2008

    Everyone Left, Go Faster - From my favorite new blog and podcast, some thoughts on productivity and unemployment:
    "...the workforce looks more productive because it included fewer people. Workers just turned it up a notch. (Feel like you're doing a job and a half? That's the feeling.)"
    This Planet Money site is great for keeping in touch and understanding the current economic crisis.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Sunday, August 10, 2008

    Serial Monogamy -- Related to my perennial topic of the problems of multi-tasking, a great line from Johanna...
    Dan said, “Oh, you want them to commit to serial monogamy project management!” I cracked up.
    Read the rest.

    Labels: , , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Tuesday, June 03, 2008

    Do more by doing less -- A few years back, I wrote about one strategy for dealing with to-do lists...
    Back when I was Director of Industrial Engineering at Nabisco's Planters-Lifesavers Division, one of my duties was to deal with the wide range of stuff that my boss (the VP of Operations) kept throwing in my direction to research, review, or report back to him on. Recognizing that he was about as curious and inquisitive and attention challenged as myself, I quickly realized that not everything he passed along to me was really top priority. Rather than go back to him and ask "What don't you want me to do?," I often found myself using my judgment to simply prune my to-do list without action. I rationalized this with the theory that if really was important, he would bring it up again. I never really got burned by doing this, so I guess my judgment was good enough.
    Today, Lifehacker recommends a similar approach to Jump-Start a Dead Action List by Eliminating Legacies.

    Things change. So should your plans.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Thursday, May 22, 2008

    Work-in-Process for Knowledge Work -- From Joe Ely...
    "Zero is easy to measure and observe. Impossible to fudge. And, I have found, amazingly liberating."
    If you want/need to move things through your system faster, you need to minimize tying up work-in-process in queues (in-boxes). And you can't get more minimized than zero.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Thursday, May 01, 2008

    Generalists Contribute to Success -- Steve Hardy at Creative Generalist points to some research that shows...
    "...there are conditions under which it actually helps to have some generalists, especially for fairly small groups, some individuals that you might think of as Jacks- or Jills-of-all-trades or multitaskers,' said Waite. 'You might actually have to pay them more and they might often do the wrong task, but if you don't have them, this whole notion of specialisation leading to greater economic productivity might actually be wrong."
    Yet another reason someone should hire me.

    Labels: ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Wednesday, April 23, 2008

    Are You Better? --
    "Are you better at what you do than you were a month or two ago?"
    ...along with a few more personal development questions from Seth Godin's latest blog post: Better?

    Pertinent questions.

    Labels: ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008

    Do you have a plan? -- From Seth Godin, Managing urgencies...
    "...Add up enough urgencies and you don't get a fire, you get a career. A career putting out fires never leads to the goal you had in mind all along.

    "...If you work in an urgent-only culture, the only solution is to make the right things urgent."
    If you don't have time to fix the processes that result in fire-fighting, you may as well plan for a career in fire-fighting.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Monday, March 17, 2008

    Busy vs. Productive -- Read it.


    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Tuesday, March 11, 2008

    The Talent Supply Chain - Again from Jack Vinson, more on Ricketts' book Reaching the Goal and resource management in services - Another view on Services and Talent Management:
    "Carry too many people on the bench, and the company is sluggish. The same as if you carry too much inventory. Carry too little, and the company can't respond to consumer demand."
    If services rely on talent the way manufacturing relies on inventory, why not manage them in a similar manner, allowing demand to "pull" on an understood replenishment chain? I think I'm starting to get it.

    (Also starting to like that word "talent" as a replacement for "resources".)

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Wednesday, January 16, 2008

    BlackBerry Balance - From Cali & Jody, a blog by the champions of Best Buy's "Results Only Work Environment".
    "...the point of technology is not to give people more access to an individual, but to give that individual more control over their time. You use your cell phone, remote internet access and/or BlackBerry to manage your job on your own terms. Your focus is on outcomes, not availability."
    It's not about how much you do - it's about how much you accomplish.

    Labels: , , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Thursday, January 10, 2008

    The Myth of Managed Multi-tasking - More on multi-tasking, via Jack Vinson.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Thursday, August 30, 2007

    Open Office Layouts: Interruption Incubators -- Food for thought on "interruption incubators". . .
    Working closely together ain't productive

    Firewall your attention at the office

    Both via Why proximity kills productivity
    Headphones at the office aren't for listening to music, but for blocking out distraction.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Thursday, August 23, 2007

    What is the best use of your time, right now? -- Gotta admit, it ain't blogging.

    Labels: ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Monday, July 30, 2007

    Good Question -- Why isn't it done yet?

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Wednesday, July 18, 2007

    Old News: Multi-tasking is Dead --
    "Multi-tasking is dead. It never worked and it never will. Intelligent people love to sing its praises because it gives them permission to avoid the much more challenging alternative: focusing on one thing." –- Timothy Ferriss, author of The 4-Hour Workweek
    Of course you already knew that.

    Also, related, from Michael S. Hyatt...
    "Most of us don't spend enough time thinking. We are so busy doing that we have, I fear, almost forgotten how to think. Yet it is our thinking, more than any other single activity, that influences our outcomes.

    "The problems we face will not likely be solved by working harder. New gadgets won't really help either. In fact, I sometimes fear that our many gadgets have only added unnecessary clutter to our lives. What we need is better, more profound thinking.

    But how can we find more time?"
    He goes on to offer a few answer about finding more "head time."

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Monday, July 02, 2007

    Doable To-Do List - What to Write -- Ideas for organizing that list of tasks so you can you can follow them "as if you're a robot" for getting things done.
    • Break it down...
    • Work through projects using next actions...
    • Use specific, active verbs...
    • Keep your list short...
    • Keep it moving...
    • Prioritize...
    • Purge...
    • Log your done items...
    Along with this advice, I've also discovered another tool that has helped me be more consistent with my GTD implementation. Watch this space...

    Labels: ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Friday, June 29, 2007

    Slacker Work Principles -- I still like the idea of productive procrastination, included as #2 in this list of 16 principles. I'm also getting used to the idea of (#3) ensuring balance by dropping things and saying no or not yet.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Friday, June 22, 2007

    Silos: Not Always a Problem -- Jack points out that sometimes silos are merely an artifact of how the work gets done, identifying two flavors...
    "The key between these types of silos is that one is imposed by rigid structures and politics, and the other is imposed by demands of personal work styles and needs."
    Read When silos work. I like pieces like this, that apply common sense to cliches - that help to avoid knee-jerk reactions due to labels. It's too easy to fall into jargon habits.

    Labels: , , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Monday, February 05, 2007

    The Most Important Trait? -- According to a survey at CIO Blogs...
    What's wrong with this picture?

    That item leading the survey with 38% of respondents - the ability to juggle multiple priorities - is pathetic. It's management's responsibility to determine the priorities, either by edict or, preferably, by some systematic process, and to provide processes to minimize re-prioritization as much as possible. If left up the the folks doing the work, either juggling and multi-tasking will occur, resulting in dropped balls and unnecessarily extended delivery dates, or those folks doing the work with choose a priority, which may not coincide with the priority best for the firm.

    I've got to believe that this survey was put together with tongue firmly in cheek. I want to believe that this survey was put together with tongue firmly in cheek. Please tell me they (including those who responded) were kidding. Please.

    Labels: , , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Friday, November 17, 2006

    Costs of Multitasking - From Johanna Rothman, who list a number of costs associated with flip-flopping from task to task and back and forth. She asks if she missed anything.

    She did. Focusing on the set-down, set-up, and defect costs of the practice, Johanna did a good internal analysis of the task costs. But outweighing them, when this is a common practice among a number of people working on dependent tasks, is the cost of delays of hand-offs from tasks to task, which translate into delays of the completion of the final project. It's more than the additional cost of individudals' time. It's also the cost of late(r) delivery of the projects and their benefits.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Friday, October 13, 2006

    Does process matter? -- Yes, but...
    "I believe that it's crucial for developers to understand more than just their team processes and start learning about business process in general. Two positive things will result from this. First, they will learn how to better interface their process with the higher-level processes. Second, they will get an appreciation for the more strategic efforts of the company and how their development teams can, and do, contribute to higher goals. This knowledge will make them more valuable to their company. For new hires working within lower-level processes, this understanding will help them quickly discover whether they are compatible with the company. There is no shame in admitting that the way you prefer, or are willing, to work is so incompatible with your personal process that neither you nor the company will benefit with you on board. I would rather know this as soon as possible, rather than having it pointed out to me at my performance review, or worse, at my exit interview.

    "Process is important, but there is not just one process for all. An enterprise has many processes, at several levels. Understanding how these processes need to work together is a critical awareness, one that is too often ignored. When you understand real process needs, you understand that the specific process you follow is not as important as whether it plays well with the others."
    From a paper by Gary Pollice in IBM's developerWorks site.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Sunday, October 16, 2005

    Re-Engineering Interruptions? -- Meet the Life Hackers -- A good article on multi-tasking in the NY Times. Some eye-opening numbers...
    When Mark crunched the data, a picture of 21st-century office work emerged that was, she says, "far worse than I could ever have imagined." Each employee spent only 11 minutes on any given project before being interrupted and whisked off to do something else. What's more, each 11-minute project was itself fragmented into even shorter three-minute tasks, like answering e-mail messages, reading a Web page or working on a spreadsheet. And each time a worker was distracted from a task, it would take, on average, 25 minutes to return to that task. To perform an office job today, it seems, your attention must skip like a stone across water all day long, touching down only periodically.
    Check it out before it disappears behind the Times' paywall.

    Labels: , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Monday, September 19, 2005

    Say No to Multi-tasking! - Chunk and dash.

    OK, got that done...

    Labels: ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Friday, August 19, 2005

    Flow On - Over at gapingvoid, Hugh brings together the questions of relevancy and flow, and suggests that Sig might have a point suggesting that "flow" is "next."

    Hate to break it to them, but those of us who have been familiar and worked with Goldratt's Theory of Constraints have long emphasized the understanding and management of "flow" as a means to assuring relevancy of activity. Whether in manufacturing, distribution, or projects and multi-project systems (like R&D product development or engineering shops), the goal of the owning parent system is the prime determinant of relevancy of activity.

    And for these systems, from those as large as the whole corporation to those as small as a project team or production cell, the means to achieving the goal are a set of interdependent activities linked by handoffs physical, informational, or transactional. The "flow" of these handoffs (think a project task network, or a process flow chart) should be limited only by the capacity of strategically selected constraint functions, which then allow a simplified focus of management on assuring the flow of work to, through, and from these constraints.

    Unfortunately, too many organizations ignore or are ignorant of the importance of constraint management, and allow too many irrelevancies -- too many erroneous assumptions -- too many misleading measurements -- to distract from the focus on flow. Too many organizations focus too much on managing capacity and cost of irrelevant parts of the system instead of focusing on managing the flow for the real source of more goal stuff -- system throughput. (If you can grow the top line - the bottom line (the goal for for-profit entities) is much more assured than if you obsess too much on the lines in between. You can only cut costs so much before hurting throughput. Throughput is potentially unbounded.)

    Once the idea of flow through the system as the source of organizational goal attainment and relevancy is understood, it's a lot easier to move on to personal flow and relevancy.

    Tags: , , , ,

    Labels: , , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Tuesday, March 08, 2005

    Multi-thinking -- In Innovation Tools, Jeffrey Baumgartner offers good advice for those who feel compelled to multi-task...
    " is inevitable that your mind occasionally turns to one task while you are working on another. A multi-tasker would be inclined to switch tasks at this point. I recommend you stick to the task at hand, but keep a notebook or at least some paper nearby when performing any tasks. (I recommend having a notebook with you all the time). When the mind turns from the task at hand to another task, simply note down your thoughts in the notebook. Then return to the task at hand."
    He goes on to suggest that a good time and place to woolgather/brainstorm/multi-thnk ideas and issues for different responsibilities is while in "long, crowded meetings." I've got concerns about consciously doing that, from a missed information perspective as well as from a civil politeness point of view, but I do like the general idea.

    Recording mental interruptions to a physical "in-box" (collection of notes) to be processed and addressed later, frees up the mind for attention to "the task at hand."

    (Via Jack Vinson; File under , Getting Things Done and Productivity)

    Labels: , , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Sunday, November 21, 2004

    Yet Another Post on Multi-Tasking -- It's a shame that this topic is still necessary, but Tony Rizzo provides a good description of something so obvious, but so misunderstood.
    "So, why is multitasking such a big problem? The answer to this question is explored best in two steps. First, imagine that you’re a customer at a bank. As you wait in an unpleasantly long line, for your turn with the teller, you notice that the teller is doing something unusual. Rather than completing each customer’s transaction, the teller is beginning the transaction of the second customer and even that of the third customer. Then, she is task-switching, from one transaction to another, without completing any transaction. Before long, the teller has four or five open transactions, with none of them close to being completed. The teller is multitasking.

    "Would you expect to complete your banking any sooner, given the teller’s multitasking paradigm? Obviously not! In fact, you can probably expect to be delayed further, by the mistakes that the teller’s frequent context switching is sure to create.

    "Of course, bank tellers don’t multitask. In such an environment, multitasking is obviously damaging. So, workers simply don’t do it." [read the whole thing]
    It's obvious for the bank teller example. Why is it not obvious in other environments? Are the pressures for attention pulling people in different directions for different tasks that strong? Why are they that strong? Is it because things are late and out of control? Why are they late and out of control? Perhaps it might be because of all the little bits and pieces of work that are only partially done. Why do we leave some things partially done and go on to other things? Because of pressure to switch gears and address other tasks...

    Labels: ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Friday, April 23, 2004

    Rizzo on Speed and Profitability -- This looks like excellent news. One of my former co-workers and friend from the TOC community of practice, a thinker/writer/teacher/consultant well worth knowing (I wish he would start blogging), Tony Rizzo of The Product Development Institute and Spherical Angle, seems to be writing a book. At least there's a series of pages on his PDI website that refer to chapters 1 through 4 (as well as an empty link for chapter 5) of something called Speed and Profitability with the Six Sigma Enterprise. These chapters touch on similar notions of multi-project management that you've been reading here, but with Tony's unique ability to draw pictures in the mind. For example...
    For a moment, think of each of your projects as a person. Imagine that you have fifty such people in one room of your facility, and you need to get all fifty into the adjacent room as fast as possible. There is one door connecting the two rooms. Now, imagine that each of these people is rewarded (or punished) on the basis of how fast he/she can make it into the next room. The ones who make it through quickly can expect to receive a reasonable reward. The ones who make it through a bit late get only their base salaries. The ones who make it through very late can expect to be encouraged to find employment elsewhere. Go ahead. Give the order to move, if you dare.

    Commonsense tells us that a few of your fifty people will make it through the door immediately, until the crowd arrives. Then, some of them will try to make it through sideways. A few others may become creative and try to take the low route, only to cause others to trip and stumble. Soon, you'll see a mountain of bodies, many of which make it through the door very late, and perhaps with injuries. You may also see a few people standing back, waiting for the mob to clear.

    Now, imagine that every few minutes you give the order to 20 or 30 more people to go through, while the mob continues to block the door. It's clear that nearly all will make it through very late. Many of these will suffer severe injuries. The ones who decide to stand back and wait for the mob to clear never go through, because the mob never clears.

    This is probably a close description of the way your projects compete with each other, for shared resources. In our little scenario, the door is a shared resource. In reality, the shared resource may be a group of systems engineers or software developers or electrical engineers...
    Nice visualization. Tony goes on in Chapter One to talk about unsynchronized multi-project environments and the resulting multi-tasking sickness that he refers to as the "dilution solution". I'll probably be getting deeper into the subsequent chapters as time goes on, but don't let that stop you from digging into Tony's stuff yourself. Now.

    Labels: , , ,

    posted by Frank - Permanent Link - |

    Current Posts (Main Blog Page)

    Previous Posts

    It is a common delusion that you make things better by talking about them. - Dame Rose Macaulay

    What's this XML thingie all about?

    View Frank Patrick's LinkedIn profileView Frank Patrick's profile


    FP's Recommended Reading
    - From the FP Bookshelf...

    ...from My AStore

    ...and some ideas from Amazon...

    Best of the FP Blog Archive
    - The really good stuff...

    Strategic Thinking and Improvement

    Enterprise PM - It Starts with Strategic Interdependence

    Face Reality

    How to Think With Your Gut

    Hugger-Mugger and Helter-Skelter

    Managing for Murphy, Satan, and Yourself

    More of the Same (Local/Global)

    PMI Congress Notes: Using Risk Management for Strategic Advantage

    Tell Me How You'll Measure Me and Ah, But What to Measure?

    What's in Your Strategy?

    Why Can't We All Just Get Along?

    Why TOC Works
    Project and Multi-Project Management
    Critical Chain and (not or) XP

    Defining Project Success (But for Whom?)

    Down 'n Dirty w/TOC and PM (Part 1 of 5 consecutive posts)

    End of Project Review

    If Project Management is the Answer, What's the Question?

    In Defense of Planning

    It Ain't the Tools

    Lessons Learned, Revisited

    Predicting Uncertain Futures

    Project Conflicts

    Project Determinism (and other myths)

    Project Portfolio Management

    Promises, Predictions, and Planning

    Removing Bottlenecks - A Core Systems Design Principle

    Stage Gates and Critical Chain

    Ten Top Sources of Project Failure (The Executive Version)

    The Meaning of "Schedule"
    Leadership and Change Management
    Consistent Leadership Behavior

    Invisible Dogma - Perpetuating Paradigms

    Nothing But Value

    On Assumption Busting

    Personal Productivity - An Excuse?

    The Psychology of Change Management

    FP's Blogroll
    - Other weblogs and sites I read

    FP's Ryze Page

    FP's Technorati Profile
    - Click the pic

    Who links to FP?

    For Your Charitable Consideration:

    Give Something Back Foundation

    Global Virtual Classroom

    FP's Link List
    - Selected Sites and Resources

    Critical Chain Discussion Group

    Lilly Software: Visual DBR

    Sciforma PS (Critical Chain Software)

    Spherical Angle (Critical Chain Software)

    Synchrono Supply Chain Planning Software

    FP Blog Archives
    - All the oldies, but goodies...

    10/09 | 09/09 | 08/09 | 07/09 | 06/09 | 05/09 | 04/09 | 03/09 | 02/09 | 01/09 | 12/08 | 11/08 | 10/08 | 09/08 | 08/08 | 07/08 | 06/08 | 05/08 | 04/08 | 03/08 | 02/08 | 01/08 | 12/07 | 11/07 | 10/07 | 09/07 | 08/07 | 07/07 | 06/07 | 05/07 | 04/07 | 03/07 | 02/07 | 01/07 | 12/06 | 11/06 | 10/06 | 09/06 | 08/06 | 07/06 | 06/06 | 05/06 | 04/06 | 03/06 | 02/06 | 01/06 | 12/05 | 11/05 | 10/05 | 09/05 | 08/05 | 07/05 | 06/05 | 05/05 | 04/05 | 03/05 | 02/05 | 01/05 | 12/04 | 11/04 | 10/04 | 09/04 | 08/04 | 07/04 | 06/04 | 05/04 | 04/04 | 03/04 | 02/04 | 01/04 | 12/03 | 11/03 | 10/03 | 09/03 | 08/03 | 07/03 | 06/03 | 05/03 | 04/03 | 03/03 | 02/03 | 01/03 | 12/02 | 11/02 | 10/02 | 09/02 | 08/02 | 07/02 | 06/02 | 03/02 | 02/02 | 12/01 | 11/01 | 10/01 | 09/01 | 08/01 | 06/01 | 02/01 | 01/01 | 12/00

    Powered by Blogger

    If you are interested in adding an easily updated weblog to your site, I would suggest you look into the free service provided by Blogger.

    Who is FP?
    Contact Focused Performance